Intara LabsIntara Labs
Soon Available in Beta

Polaris is your
reasoning engine.

Stop searching. Start asking. Polaris indexes your entire repository, understands dependencies, and validates every answer by running real tests in a secure sandbox.

Semantic Indexing

We don't just grep strings. We build a full dependency graph (AST) of your codebase to understand how functions, classes, and services interact.

Sandboxed Execution

When you ask 'What happens if I change this?', Polaris spins up an ephemeral Docker container, applies the change, and reports the actual side effects.

Verified Answers

LLMs hallucinate. Polaris proves. It generates test cases for its own answers and only shows you the solution if the tests pass.

What you can do with it.

Polaris sits between your project management tools and your codebase — the connective tissue no one else owns.

01

Ticket Intelligence

The connective tissue between your PM tools and your codebase.

Jira doesn't know what your code does. GitHub doesn't know what your tickets mean. Polaris sits in between — translating vague tickets into properly scoped engineering work, attaching file-level starting points, and writing post-mortem summaries when tickets close.

$PM → "Users are complaining the app feels slow"
POLARIS TICKET OUTPUT
Title:Investigate slow render on dashboard — FCP regression
Repro:Load /dashboard with 50+ items. FCP exceeds 3.2s (target: 1.5s)
Start:components/Dashboard.tsx:142, hooks/useMetrics.ts:67
Prior:PERF-891 PERF-1204 (similar symptoms different root cause)
AC:FCP < 1.5s with 100 items. No layout shift above 0.1 CLS.
ticket created · synced to Linear · assigned to @eng
02

Change Confidence Score

"Should I ship this?" — answered before you open a PR.

Run polaris check and get back not just "what breaks" but a confidence score with a recommendation. You're not replacing code review — you're eliminating the class of PRs that should never have been opened. The simulation layer is what makes the score credible — Polaris actually ran the tests.

$$ polaris check — change JWT_EXPIRY from 1h to 7d
CONFIDENCE REPORT
Confidence to ship safely:34%
WebSocketService has no graceful token refresh — sessions will hang
Mobile app (iOS) uses stored expiry value, no dynamic fetch
Web frontend handles 401s correctly and will re-auth
No test coverage on the refresh flow in affected files
Fix WebSocketService first. Estimated 2-4 hours. Then re-run — confidence will likely reach 80%+.
03

Onboarding Intelligence

"First Week" mode — the most painful problem in engineering, solved.

A new engineer joins and wastes their first 2-3 weeks figuring out how the codebase is structured. Every company does this terribly. Polaris generates a personalized onboarding map based on which part of the codebase they'll actually work in. Not generic docs — a living, queryable guide generated from the actual codebase state right now.

$$ polaris onboard --team=payments --role=backend
PERSONALIZED ONBOARDING MAP
>8 files you'll touch most in your first month
>Here's how auth works, explained as if you just joined
>3 things that broke in payments last quarter and why
>@sarah owns payment processing · @mike owns the infra layer
>Open PRs in your area you should read first
04

Decision History

Code tells you what. Git tells you when. Nothing tells you why.

Polaris ingests Slack threads, PR comments, RFC documents, and Confluence pages alongside the codebase. When you ask "why was this decision made?", you get the full story — not just the code. This is completely unsolved. Sourcegraph doesn't do it. Linear doesn't do it. It requires connecting systems nobody has connected.

$$ polaris why "rate limit set to 100 requests/min"
DECISION TRAIL
PR #891Set after the March incident. Original limit was 500.
Slack @sarah"500 caused a cascade failure in the payment service during peak load" — March 14th
CodeTODO in api/rate_limiter.ts line 47 — revisit when payment service is refactored
RFC-12Rate limiting strategy doc — approved Q1, author: @james
05

Regression Archaeology

"Has this broken before?" — answered in 5 seconds, not 30 minutes.

When a bug comes in, the first thing a senior engineer does is check: have we seen this before? They dig through Slack, old tickets, git blame. It takes 30 minutes. Polaris does it in 5 seconds. You're building institutional memory that survives people leaving the company.

$$ BUG: Upload failing with 413 error
3 MATCHES FOUND
BUG-1204 (8 months ago)same error, different cause: nginx config
Fixed by @mike in PR #445
BUG-891 (14 months ago)S3 bucket policy was too restrictive
Fixed by @sarah in PR #312
INCIDENT-03 (2 years ago)body-parser default limit hit in prod
Post-mortem: incident-03-review.md
Conclusion: Most likely cause: body-parser or nginx (matches pattern from BUG-1204)
06

Context Briefing

"What changed since I was last here?" — your daily driver.

Engineers context-switch constantly. They leave a feature for 2 weeks to fix something urgent, then come back. Reconstructing context wastes hours. Polaris gives you a returning context briefing that makes you productive in minutes. This is what makes engineers open Polaris every single morning.

$$ polaris briefing --module=auth
CONTEXT BRIEFING · AUTH MODULE
>3 PRs merged that touch files you care about
>@james refactored token validation to use the new middleware
>New env var JWT_SECRET_V2 added (migration in progress)
>1 open PR from @lisa changes behavior you need to know about
>You last touched this module 11 days ago

See how it works.

Ready to verify?

Join 3,000+ engineers expecting more from their tools.